<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transferring Nil Rate bands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theparaplanner.com/2008/08/06/transferring-nil-rate-bands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theparaplanner.com/2008/08/06/transferring-nil-rate-bands/</link>
	<description>The site for Paraplanners and Paraplanning in the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:36:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: justin roake</title>
		<link>http://www.theparaplanner.com/2008/08/06/transferring-nil-rate-bands/comment-page-1/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>justin roake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theparaplanner.com/2008/08/06/transferring-nil-rate-bands/#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>A thought re FlexWoL policies written in trust for IHT purposes: the idea is to provide sufficient funds prior to Probate to fund the IHT due, but the delays in obtaining the transferred NRB may mean that the sum assured on such policies should ignore the second NRB - as the Revenue will also ignore it until the 216 form and all its requirements are received. Therefore higher sums assured required  for such policies? Discuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A thought re FlexWoL policies written in trust for IHT purposes: the idea is to provide sufficient funds prior to Probate to fund the IHT due, but the delays in obtaining the transferred NRB may mean that the sum assured on such policies should ignore the second NRB &#8211; as the Revenue will also ignore it until the 216 form and all its requirements are received. Therefore higher sums assured required  for such policies? Discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

